She promised a “true pop event” and she delivered! Lady Gaga’s groundbreaking video for the new single “Telephone” featuring Beyoncé is now available to view!
Read the full story »Shopping, fashion, makeup, designers & trends
Fab interviews, music, movies, runway & more
Dating, relationships, men, advice & orgasms
TV, movie, music and celebrity buzz
News & controversies everyone’s chatting about
It is known for cooking local delicacies, but an Indian restaurant in the Malaysian capital has McDonald’s up in arms. It wants the restaurant to change its 
name, and has been fighting an eight-year long legal battle.
Forwomenonline.com
Try this delicious recipe for Blueberry Lemon Crepes with Custard Sauce! Absolutely delectable!
Jamie tackles unhealthy eating in his new ABC show, “Food Revolution!”
Friends say the former child star was broke and owed thousands of dollars.
Heidi Montag has teamed up with Ron Howard and the guys at Funny or Die to take on financial reform legislation… HUNH?!
We know Heidi may not be the first person you’d think of when …
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
[...] Fast Food Giant Battle Against The Little Guy: McDonalds v … [...]
The recent McDonald’s v. McCurry ruling is not surprising. Just by the three main DuPont factors alone, appearance, sound and meaning, these two marks are arguably not confusingly similar. Add to that the difference in menus, and the difference in trade dress, and you have a pretty strong case for McCurry, which the panel seemingly accepted. The letters “Mc” cannot be totally, exclusively owned by one entity worldwide. And it’s not as if people are going to mix up McCurry with McDonalds. Now, if McCurry used the golden arches, had a clown and similar characters associated with the restaurant, that would be problematic. Those elements were not present in this case. On our site, http://www.trademarksprotected.com, we help with these trademark issues and any trademark questions.